How can the swindle video be recommended, after it’s been proven to be wrong?
Question by Bob: How can the swindle video be recommended, after it’s been proven to be wrong?
This shows exactly how the video distorted the science, complete with references to the literature:
http://www.amos.org.au/BAMOS_GGWS_SUBMISSION_final.htm
The British press took it apart:
“A Channel 4 documentary claimed that climate change was a conspiratorial lie. But an analysis of the evidence it used shows the film was riddled with distortions and errors.”
http://news.independent.co.uk/environment/climate_change/article2355956.ece
“Pure Propaganda”
http://www.medialens.org/alerts/07/0313pure_propaganda_the.php
Even the channel which broadcast it thinks it’s wrong. If you go to their website on the movie it says “Confused now? Ask the Expert”, with a link. The questions go to a mainstream scientist who says global warming is mostly caused by man.
So, why did they broadcast it?
“The science might be bunkum, the research discredited. But all that counts for Channel 4 is generating controversy.”
http://environment.guardian.co.uk/climatechange/story/0,,2032572,00.html
Corrected second link:
http://environment.independent.co.uk/climate_change/article2355956.ece
Corrected second link:
http://environment.independent.co.uk/climate_change/article2355956.ece
Best answer:
Answer by dana1981
The only people I’ve seen who recommend it are global warming deniers who are looking for any evidence to confirm their denial, and don’t care about its accuracy or source.
Plus the guy who said he changed his mind about global warming due to the Swindle. I guess he wasn’t very familiar with the science behind the issue to begin with.
Add your own answer in the comments!
